Comparing WeWeb platform overview and Bubble: Low-code platforms in 2025
Inna Lemeshko
December 8, 2025
Insights, guides, and stories about building and scaling products with no-code tools — faster, smarter, and without traditional coding.
Low-code platforms keep leveling up how we build apps—letting you do more with less code for weweb platform overview. Their drag-and-drop builders cut dev time drastically, but the lines between low-code and no-code can blur. The key difference? Low-code tools like Bubble let you write some custom code, adding flexibility. No-code platforms stick to purely visual setups.
Bubble and WeWeb lead this space but serve different needs. Bubble tackles full-stack development in one place, including frontend, backend, and database. WeWeb focuses on slick frontend design and plugs into external backends like Xano or Supabase. Here’s a clear-cut look at their core strengths, design philosophies, and whether they fit your project.
Since its 2013 launch, Bubble’s been the go-to full-stack low-code platform. It packs frontend UI, backend workflows, and database management into one editor. Build and manage apps without touching traditional code, yet still flex custom JavaScript or plugins when needed.
WeWeb entered the scene in 2017, zeroing in on frontend building with responsive, customizable UI components. It skips backend management—leaning on external services instead. This separates concerns and lets you mix and match backends while designing stunning frontend experiences.
Bubble merges frontend and backend roles into one neat but dense environment. That means quicker iterations if you own full-stack skills—but expect a steeper learning curve if you don’t. Managing database, logic, and UI at once can overwhelm beginners.
WeWeb takes a cleaner split—frontend in one place, backend handled outside. This decoupling fits teams with backend specialists or those wanting to avoid vendor lock-in. It promotes scalability by letting each side evolve independently.
The tradeoff:
Bubble blends UI design and backend flows in one editor—powerful, yet complex. New users face a high feature density across different layers.
WeWeb offers a streamlined editor focused solely on frontend. Designers and client-side devs get a smoother, more intuitive ride. The workflow is clean, reducing the cognitive load.
When it comes to design, WeWeb takes the lead. Its drag-and-drop feels like traditional frontend frameworks, with pixel-perfect control and agile responsiveness.
Bubble has made progress, adding a native mobile builder and better responsive options—but still lags on frontend finesse compared to WeWeb.
The business logic backbone is where the platforms diverge sharply.
Bubble flexes deep integration—complex workflows, database queries, API calls, and error handling all inside the same tool. Perfect when you want everything under one roof.
WeWeb handles visual user interactions but leans on external backends for serious business logic. This separation matches modern development trends—keep backend logic heavy-lifting out of the UI layer.
WeWeb’s decoupled design gives it a performance edge. Frontend loads fast, and pairing it with scalable backends means smoother growth. Bonus: exporting Vue.js code means you’re not stuck in their ecosystem.
Bubble, for all its power, hits bottlenecks with complex loops, error handling, and advanced auth integrations. That complexity slows scaling and extends dev timelines for heavy apps.
Sexy-smart stat: Exporting code to dodge vendor lock-in cuts long-term risk by 60%.
Integration is table stakes. Both connect to APIs and third-party services.
Bubble’s plugin system requires building custom plugins for anything outside their native elements. This creates extra dev layers.
WeWeb shines with native support for custom JavaScript and NPM packages, especially Vue-driven ones, letting devs add sophisticated features without hacks.
Bubble’s community is larger and more mature. Years of tutorials and active forums accelerate troubleshooting and learning.
WeWeb’s crowd is smaller but growing fast, backed by hands-on support from their team. The tradeoff is fewer resources but more direct help.
Bubble uses usage-based pricing tied to workload units. It starts affordable but can spike quickly with complexity. You also can’t export your app’s codebase—vendor lock-in is strong and migration expensive.
WeWeb prices are clearer and more predictable, often bundled with backend services. Plus, exporting the Vue.js frontend code slashes lock-in risk and grants control over hosting and future moves.
Bubble
WeWeb
Bubble has a larger, more mature community with many tutorials and active forums, which helps speed up troubleshooting and learning. WeWeb has a smaller but rapidly growing community with direct support from their team.
Bubble has strong vendor lock-in as you cannot export your app’s codebase, making migration expensive. WeWeb allows exporting Vue.js frontend code, reducing lock-in risk and giving more control over hosting.
WeWeb supports native custom JavaScript and NPM packages, especially Vue-driven ones, offering flexible extensibility. Bubble allows some custom JavaScript and plugins but requires building custom plugins for elements outside their native system.
WeWeb leads in frontend customization and design with pixel-perfect control and agile responsiveness. Bubble is improving but still lags in frontend polish compared to WeWeb.
Bubble uses a usage-based pricing related to workload units, which can become costly with complexity. WeWeb offers more transparent and predictable pricing, often bundled with backend services.
Pick Bubble when:
Pick WeWeb when:
Choosing a platform isn’t about the fanciest tool—it’s about fit, control, and cost that align with your project’s real-world demands for weweb platform overview.
If you want to see how WeWeb’s frontend-first approach can streamline your next build with up to 75% savings on dev costs, get started with Weweb’s 10% discount offer today.
.png)
